SCREEN-L Archives

April 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Rabkin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Apr 1993 07:51:28 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
JLongo writes
> I'm not suggesting that COPS doesn't leave any roomfor interpretation.  As
> Jon Nealon noted way back, one often finds himself/herself yelling at the
> television screen.  However, by having the camera with the cops the viewer
> automatically identifies with them.  It is this process of identification
> to which I was refering.
> JL
Again, I must question the word "automatically."  The effect
mentioned is surely there in, say, *84 Charlie Mopic*, but not
in the work of John Cassavetes, at least as I recall it.  I
think that like the ten-years' struggle behind most "overnight
successes," there is a lot of thought and manipulation and
a complex confluence of production values, subject matter,
editing, plot, etc. that goes into our "automatic" response
to any given camera "technique."
Eric
 
Eric Rabkin                [log in to unmask]
Department of English      [log in to unmask]
University of Michigan     office    : 313-764-2553
Ann Arbor MI 48109-1045    dept      : 313-764-6330
                           voice msgs: 313-763-3130

ATOM RSS1 RSS2