Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 27 Apr 1993 07:51:28 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
JLongo writes
> I'm not suggesting that COPS doesn't leave any roomfor interpretation. As
> Jon Nealon noted way back, one often finds himself/herself yelling at the
> television screen. However, by having the camera with the cops the viewer
> automatically identifies with them. It is this process of identification
> to which I was refering.
> JL
Again, I must question the word "automatically." The effect
mentioned is surely there in, say, *84 Charlie Mopic*, but not
in the work of John Cassavetes, at least as I recall it. I
think that like the ten-years' struggle behind most "overnight
successes," there is a lot of thought and manipulation and
a complex confluence of production values, subject matter,
editing, plot, etc. that goes into our "automatic" response
to any given camera "technique."
Eric
Eric Rabkin [log in to unmask]
Department of English [log in to unmask]
University of Michigan office : 313-764-2553
Ann Arbor MI 48109-1045 dept : 313-764-6330
voice msgs: 313-763-3130
|
|
|