SCREEN-L Archives

April 1991

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Fiona Oceanstar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 91 08:18:57 -0400
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Fascinating stuff, Steve.  "The meaning of the original work no longer
lies in what it uniquely says but in what it uniquely is."  This makes
the meaning seem terribly desiccated, like the meanings in books
collected by book collectors.  Did you know that one of the hallmarks
of quality, in a book to be collected, is that the spine has never been
broken?
 
How would it be, if the film had never been seen...
 
							--Fiona

ATOM RSS1 RSS2