LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: theatrical trailer prod.

Pip Chodorov <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 6 Sep 1995 19:05:19 -0400
text/plain (21 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
Two short (maybe obvious) comments
 
>I had noticed how some trailers looked great, but this one really >appealed
to me.  It was beautifully shot
 
Trailers aren't shot, but are edited down from the feature. If you liked the
cinematography in a trailer, this is not a special property distinguishing
the trailer from the film. It means the film itself is shot well.
 
>ads are a great place to begin to admire film.  All in all, I think
>everyone should consider these ads to be mini-movies in themselves.
 
Ads have huge budgets - sometimes as big as feature films, and for only
thirty seconds. They can afford to look good. Hopefully anyway.
 
(Pip Chodorov)
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3