SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Tonelli, Melissa" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Mar 1995 12:26:26 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
I would have to disagree with some recent post's (including Renato's)
regarding analysis of film by a director/writer/crew while on the
set.Perhaps the analysis is not vocalized on the set during the shoot, but
the art direction, lighting, framing of a shot (including what kind of
angles to use-- high vs. low, wide vs. c.u.) are all attempts to convey some
meaning beyond furthering a plot line, no?
 
Melissa Tonelli
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2