SCREEN-L Archives

February 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kelly Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Feb 1994 09:03:28 -0600
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>I appreciate the leads about other TV series or films which are based on the
>same interest in voyeurism into the "private" lives of "real" people. Why are
>they more interesting than fictional characters? For whatever reason (and I
>would love to hear some speculations), this trend to
>documentary-as-entertainment (eg _Cops_ and that whole genre) is a fascinating
>twist in the positioning of documentary approaches in today's popular culture.
Pam-
What about Marchand's (_Advertising the American Dream_) tracing of the
creation of the desire to "eavesdrop" on people's personal lives in
dramatized, direct address ads?  He connects this to the "intense self
scrutiny" manufactured by advertising and I think that its incorporation
into more strictly narrative forms opens questions about the construction
of our sense of our place within a larger community--that is, allowing us
to judge our personal experiences against other's "personal" experiences
rather than "fictionalized" experiences.
Kelly

ATOM RSS1 RSS2