SCREEN-L Archives

November 1997, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Gareth B." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Nov 1997 12:56:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> Do you actually mean that the
> fact that ROBOCOP was an economic success alters the ideological content of
> the film.
 
An excellent question. Every "cinematic event" contains at least two
stories: the one which the screenwriter wrote, and the meta-story: the
story of the making of the film, which includes such factors as money
(how raised and from whom), casting, choice of director and director's
choices, promotion (style, target audience considerations), and all the
other factors, not excluding such meanings as overlaid by a director on
the script.
 
I find it hard to refer to either story without reference to the other.
In movies, creativity is the yin of it, business the yang, and without
both, you've got nothing.
 
Paul E. Clinco
 
----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/screensite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2