SCREEN-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
gerardo herrera <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:31:24 -0500
text/plain (44 lines)
I too was hoping that Cate Blanchett would win the Oscar for Best Actress.
I thought her performance in Elizabeth was far better than Gwyneth's in SIL.

I'm glad to learn that I am not alone in my opinion.

Gerry Herrera
Script and Screenwriting
Regent University
Virginia Beach, Virginia

P.S. I also enjoyed Cate's performance in Oscar and Lucinda.

At 10:27 AM 3/24/99 +1100, you wrote:
>Does anyone else think it's strange that Gwyneth Paltrow won the Best
>Actress Oscar over Cate Blanchett? I know Gwyneth is a popular choice but I
>don't think she's a very versatile or convincing actor, she was adequate
>for the part in SIL but it didn't seem to be a difficult or deep role.
>Cate's performance in Elizabeth was very convincing and I lost all
>awareness that it was a part she was playing. It makes me question the
>purpose of the award, I know it is driven by studio PR but I thought there
>was some pretence at giving it for the best performance in the films
>Kate Butler
>Kate Butler
>Department of Visual Communication
>RMIT University, Australia
>[log in to unmask]
> "If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure."
>   -- Vice President Dan Quayle.
>To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
>in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama: