SCREEN-L Archives

October 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 13 Oct 1994 19:58:57 EDT
In-Reply-To:
Message of Thu, 13 Oct 1994 17:03:41 CST from <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
The idea of hiding behind a generic name such as Alan Smithee  is part
of a long theatrical tradition where actors doubling in roles (or hiding
their responsibility) adopted the name George Spelvin.  This practice
has been traced back as early as 1886 in the United States.  In the way
of these things, I'd be surprised if there aren't similar anonymous
names used other countries.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]>  <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2