SCREEN-L Archives

September 2004, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:34:11 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Bill Rainbolt writes:

>On the other hand, maybe DVDs just intensify the angst we already feel in
>an information-overload world.

Agreed - as I wrote in my previous post, because the medium offers the
facility to include extra footage, audio and a variety of interactive
features, publishers feel that they have to include them.  Presumably this
is out of fear that consumers will feel short-changed if all they get is
the film.  Personally I'd much rather have the film encoded at a decent
bitrate (i.e. 8mbps plus) and nothing else, in order to take advantage of
the definition advantage that DVD offers over VHS, rather than the film
plus a whole load of inane crap which no-one is ever likely to sit through
anyway, all at a much lower resolution.

Leo

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.ScreenSite.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2