SCREEN-L Archives

April 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Benjamin Leontief Alpers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Apr 1993 17:03:44 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
While Robert Johnson is right in general about the movies, I think he is
wrong about _Birth of a Nation_.  Although the film ended up a huge success,
when the project was undertaken, almost nobody - aside from Griffith and his
immediate circle - thought that such an expensive, long, and costly film
would make any money.  It was made not so much out of commercial motives as
out of Griffith's deep belief 1) in the possibilities for motion picture
art [a quite noble belief, IMHO] and 2) in Thomas Dixon's racist view of
the history of the South, the Civil War and Reconstruction [a dangerous
belief which, with the release of _Birth of a Nation_ helped restart the
KKK].
 
-- Ben Alpers
   Princeton University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2