Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jul 1994 10:13:28 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Jul 1994, P.G. Springer wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 1994, MECHAR,KYLE WILLIAM,MR wrote:
> Wins out? Against? Good grief, this ongoing argument against
> Philadelphia and Tom Hanks reveals some of the most paranoid, precious,
> overanalyzed nonsense ever.
C'mon. let's not get into another endless argument over PC; reading a
text can never be that simplistic. Look: Kyle has his reading; you have
yours; and I have my own. None of our readings is the right one; they are
merely *different*, and frankly Kyle sheds an interesting light on
_Philadelphia_--one that I would seriously consider, and no doubt draw
from, if I wrote an extended analysis of _Philadelphia_.
Patrick Bjork
Dept. of English
Bismarck State College
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|