SCREEN-L Archives

October 1998, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Damian Peter Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:57:04 +0100
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
I think that we should discuss and clarify what we mean by
the term 'realism'.
Just for once.
Gloves off, no holds barred.
Get it all out in the open, because many seem to be
crossing boundaries, and confusing 'realism' with
'verisimilitude', 'neo-realism', 'cinema verite' etc.
(I find it very confusing when this happens, and I'm sure
the confusion is not intended.)
Which films employ 'realism' or are 'realist'?
Can we question the validity of each desciption?
Etc., etc.
That way, every time a film comes along which brings up the
subject, we all have a common frame of reference.
 
----------------------
Damian Peter Sutton
[log in to unmask]
 
----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/screensite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2