SCREEN-L Archives

October 2003, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
bad takes incorporated into a film
From:
"W. McCarthy" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:05:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Would someone be kind enough to tell me (or to speculate on) which
was the first Hollywood-type film that incorporated into its
conclusion takes containing various sorts of errors (flubbed lines,
in the main)?

Thanks,
Bill McCarthy

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2