SCREEN-L Archives

January 2002, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Anthony Rocha <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:13:53 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In a message dated 01/09/2002 7:18:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Given that both 'Jackie Brown' and the remake of 'Shaft' performed poorly
> at the box office,

This films both made money and were very cheap to make, relative.

Look at world wide gross and video grosses, not just gate. Gate wasn't bad
either.

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2