SCREEN-L Archives

May 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Ryersbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 May 1996 19:47:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> Someone recently stated that the Peoples script for Blade Runner is a
> masterwork of its genre. I have never read the script as opposed to
> seeing both the original release and director's cut of the film. While I
> appreciate the inventiveness of the film's visual style, especially the
> repetition of motifs having to do with the eye, but the narrative never
> seems to explore any of the interesting implications of the story. There
> are interesting themes broached on memory and the construction of
> identity, and the use of empathic response as a means of distinguishing
> the human from the inhuman reminds me a bit of Bataille's Theory of
> Religion, however, these elements seem to be overshadowed by cliched
> references to historical slavery and racism and by a forced resolution of
> Deckard's relationship to Rachel at the film's conclusion. If the
> problems that I have with the film are substantial, could someone please
> justify for me the epithet of masterwork that this film boasts?
>
>                       paul ryersbach
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2