SCREEN-L Archives

March 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"P.J. O'Connell (PA) 814-865-3333" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Mar 1993 22:55:00 EST
In-Reply-To:
37PSVFB AT CMUVM.BITNET -- Mon, 1 Mar 1993 06:54:00 EST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
Sound like the "Everything is rhetoric" argument again.  Sure, everything
has some effect on the receiver--possibly.  Reporters (as well as
propagandists) can never know how their message may be received; we just try
to get it mostly right most of the time.  The level of skepticism/cynicism
of the audience is variable, as is their background, their interest level,
their fatigue level, etc., etc.  At least give some of us credit for trying
to get it right.  And perhaps even assume that it's POSSIBLE to get it right.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2