SCREEN-L Archives

July 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gene Stavis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jul 1995 17:13:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
----------------------------- Begin Original Text
-----------------------------
 
The
movies turn out to have long, boring flight sequences, shots that contain so
much visual info that most people can't assimilate it all, etc...
----------------------------- End Original Text -----------------------------
 
Odd. I would have thought that the more visual info a shot has the more
complex and interesting it would be.
 
And, don't forget: one man's "boring" is another man's "magnificent."
 
My view is that the sci-fi, horror genres are among the most popular. I think
you are basing your observation on too small a sample.
 
Finally, spectacle for its own sake is almost always unsatisfactory.
Spectacle in support of a strong narrative, well-developed characters and a
true cinematic sense can be very exciting.
 
Gene Stavis, School of Visual Arts - NYC
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2