SCREEN-L Archives

November 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gabriela Warkentin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Nov 1995 19:42:58 -0600
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hi, this might sound like a very naif question, but I would still appreciate
any comment on it. I was discussing with some students, who were watching
silent films almost for the first time in their lives (freshmen), the issue
of visual evolution: at what point can we say that film-language changes
from simpler forms to the more complex ones we have today. Which would be
the films (from the beginning till now) that marked a turning point in
visual language, in music becoming more and more a soundtrack industry, all
this stuff. I do have some examples, but I would like to hear some ideas, if
possible. Hope anyone is interested and doesn't consider this a rather dull
question.
Thanks, Gabriela
 
Gabriela Warkentin  [log in to unmask]
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2