SCREEN-L Archives

May 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gloria Monti (GD 1995)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 May 1994 17:33:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
> As I've said elsewhere, the diegetic/extradiegetic distinction, when
> applied to music, is a useful point of departure but quickly becomes
> untenable.  We can all cite examples of music which first seems
> extra-diegetic, which is eventually justified by a radio or phonograph
> etc. diegetically.
 
        I believe it is important to maintain the distinction between onscreen
and offscreen diegetic sound.  Can one see the radio& phonograph you are
describing?
 
        Gloria Monti, who's been reading too much *Film Art* obviously

ATOM RSS1 RSS2