SCREEN-L Archives

September 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Larsson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Sep 1996 11:44:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Just to clarify my earlier point about the darker skin tones of the poacher,
which Richard Leskosky and David Desser thought was going a bit far.
 
I agree.  I was just reporting what several reviewers (including Siskel and/or
Ebert) at the time had mentioned.  It *is* a generic/narrative convention
with ancient roots, but whether that makes it racist, archetypal, or merely
cliched has, I think, to be taken in the context of the film as a whole.
 
Don Larsson, Mankato State U (MN)
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2