SCREEN-L Archives

May 2000, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2000 09:13:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
R Hunt writes:

     > And speaking of aspect ratio, for years I've been giving students my
     > standard anti-letterboxing lecture, but I'm wondering if anyone can offer
     > fresh examples of how an altered aspect ratio damages or changes film
     > content, perspective, etc....

and i'm puzzled  . .   i would have thought  the premise that

     > an altered aspect ratio damages or changes film

would lead to a PRO-letterboxing lecture . . .

is there something i'm missing, or is this just a slip of the fingers? . . . if
it's
not an error i would very much like to know what the  "standard
anti-letterboxing"
argument entails

mike frank

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2