Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Apr 1993 14:47:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Content-Type: Text
Content-Length: 1480
Jerry Henderson asks about a policy concerning ownership of works produced for
class. Does anyone else feel about this as I do? In short, the idea that a
university can lay claim to ownership of a work produced for class stinks.
Can a school claim that a thesis written for a requirement is theirs, not the
student's? Does the school own a copyright on the work, paper, film,
whatever or does the school have a basis for claiming a copyright? Hardly.
The student is the artist, not the school. The student produces the work, not
the school.
A student pays money to take the course, pay for advice and her tuition helps
buy classroom equipment, whether cameras, computers, or overhead projectors.
If the school claims to be a "producer" because it allows the use of film or
video equipment, can a rental company also claim to be a producer because it
rents Arris to users? Not in your dreams.
Now if the school would like to pay someone to produce a film for them, and a
contract so stipulates, it's a different matter. However, any student who
signs away the right to her work simply because it's done for a class
project should look at going to another school where intellectual property is
deemed sacred.
Can you imagine a professor at this same school giving up rights to
scholarship because a book or script was partially typed on a university
computer in the professor's office? Fat chance.
Let's not apply double standards to students.
Content-Type: Text
Content-Name: c:\roger
Content-Length: 598
*************************************************************************
* Roger Bullis Internet: [log in to unmask] *
* *
* Division of Communication *
* University of Wisconsin "Never stand under a tall dog" *
* Stevens Point, WI 54481 *
* *
*************************************************************************
|
|
|