SCREEN-L Archives

July 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Shawn Levy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Jul 1994 16:27:01 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Actually, it was a Hong Kong film QT ripped off -- quite thoroughly, I
might add, though not only:  There's still plenty of invention in "Rez
Dogs" to go around.  I don't have the name of the HK film handy, but a
recent issue of "Film Threat" compared the films fairly closely and
included some frame-by-frame stuff that was shocking proof of the, uh,
reliance of "RD" on the original.  There's more info on this to be found
in the "Rez Dogs" FAQ which is ocassionally posted in
rec.arts.movies.cult.  Or someone there could lead you to an FTP site for
that FAQ.  At any rate, bear in mind the words of T. S. Eliot:  (slightly
paraphrased) "An immature artist imitates; a mature artist plagiarizes."
 
    Shawn Levy       | "If we only had a lousy little grand
 [log in to unmask] |  We could be a millionaire!"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2