SCREEN-L Archives

July 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Warren Scott Oberman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jul 1994 17:01:22 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
This film blew me away. I would watch a documentary a week if I thought
they'd all be this good/creative/insightful/entertaining etc..
 
My question: Does the Gould film, given its experimental nature, even
constitute a "documentary" film, if so, are there more like it, and if
not, why aren't more directors willing to try the genre out, especially
considering how the Gould film explodes the old form and goes everywhere
the "traditional" documentary (at least the ones I have seen) do not.
 
Cheers,
 
warren

ATOM RSS1 RSS2