SCREEN-L Archives

March 1991

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
82 Malcolm Dean 213-5-5676 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Mar 91 19:28:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> The reason that "jargon" gets used is that if you had to explain what "discour
> e theory"means every time you wanted to use the word, you'd never get to _say_
> anything: you'd spend all your time defining words.                   ven disc
>
> M. Tepper
> Brown University
 
There is, however, the tremendous danger that participants are
simply convincing themselves they are actually communicating, or
that the subject of their discussion has an objective reality.
This is largely the case in obscure academic areas such as
semiotics and film theory, where it has been oh-so-trendy to be a
neo-Marxist (until the recent collapse of Marxist credibility),
and populate one's prose with all sorts of taken-for-granted
self-delusions.
 
I say if you can't say it simply, something is probably fishy.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2