Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 9 Sep 1995 15:47:33 PDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Perhaps this is another kind of unreliable narration: when the shooting,
scoring and lighting of a scene create a impression (often sinister) that
turns out to be inaccurate. In some cases the camera is simply expressing
and reinforcing a character's point of view (i.e., in "Meet Me in St. Louis"
when Tootie approaches the neighbor's house on Halloween; she is terrified
but after she flees we see that he is a nice if puzzled old man whose
snarling dog is really quite gentle). But how about the frightening way the
scientists are presented in "E.T."--all Gestapo-like flashlights and tromping
feet, with relentless forward tracking and low camera placement, until they
reveal themselves as benevolent extra-terrestrial-lovers? Whose subjective
experience does this express? E.T.'s? I don't think so; sometimes he isn't
even aware of the ominous presence. It's simply the filmmaker trying to
create suspense by misleading the audience. I call it cheating.
Barbara Bernstein email: [log in to unmask]
Kinexis, San Francisco, CA
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
|
|
|