SCREEN-L Archives

April 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"P.J. O'Connell (PA) 814-865-3333" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Apr 1993 08:45:00 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
The current crop of low-end non-linear video editing systems are basically
toys.  They are useful in that they give you a look at what the future of
video editing may likely be, but their limitations are simply too great for
anything like meaningful work.  (Although I saw a tape produced with a
Hasbro?  KiddyCam?  system recently that was quite good, l00-line resolution
and all; just proves--again--that content is far more important than
technical quality.) Among the low-end products that is worth a look is
Adobe'sPremier 2.0; it has some promise.
 
The lowest cost system acceptable for professional work at the moment is the
Avid Media Suite Pro; 30 fps full-motion, full-frame video, with 3/4"
quality output to tape.  System lists for $9995, but you need a Quadra 950
and one or more 2-gig hard drives to make it operational; about $24,000 (but
talk to a hungry dealer).  Its biggest limitation is that it does not
generate an EDL; however, there is reportedly third-party software that does
provide EDLs.
 
Your best short-term bet is probably one of the computer-based editors that
utilizes tape decks as source and record; they are still useful, in spite of
the rush to the "new" technology (film--remember that stuff--has had
"non-linear" editing for 100 years).  The NAB show this month will have some
new products; perhaps there will be some pleasant surprises.  We're all
waiting.
 
PJO

ATOM RSS1 RSS2