SCREEN-L Archives

December 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Norm Holland <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Dec 1993 09:37:46 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Sat, 4 Dec 1993 09:19:51 -0500 from <DBOUSE@ALBION>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
In my book, The Critical I (Columbia, 1992), the first section deals with
three people's responses to the soft-porn _The Story of O_.  But, as
Derek Bouse points out, why should we bother with actual responses
when we can settle the matter by theorizing?  Best,
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Norman N. Holland       Marston-Milbauer Professor of English     |
| University of Florida   Gainesville FL 32611  Tel: (904) 377-0096 |
| BITNET: nnh@nervm       INTERNET: [log in to unmask]         |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

ATOM RSS1 RSS2