SCREEN-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Kazan award
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:36:01 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
Paul Wiener was right that Kazan would say nothing to undo any damage.
This would seem to indicate he is unrepentent about naming names.

My question is why he seems a particular target for hatred by leftist
intellectual whereas, unless I have missed something, other "friendly
witnesses" to the hearings like Sterling Hayden, Robert Rossen and Jerome
Robbins (to name a few) seem rarely villified in print.  Does anyone know
if Kazan behaved considerably worse than some of the others?

Mark Netter
[log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2