SCREEN-L Archives

April 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shmuel Gudowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Apr 1993 17:49:20 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
In regard to the discussion involving Mr. Jenkins and Ms. Aaron, perhaps I, as
a non-film scholar but someone who tries to be an intelligent film buff, might
make a small contribution.  Both james Monaco's The New Wave and G. Crisp's  Er
ic Rohmer seem to me examples of closely reasoned, aesthetic, yet non-a-histori
cal (what a term!) criticism that is both sophiticated yet accessible and not j
argon-laden.  I cpmmend these two examples, even though I find myself agreeing
more with monaco than Crisp.  Yet sepite my differences with the latter, I cann
ot and do not deny his acuity as a critic and his avoidance of esotericism in h
us language and approach.
 By the way, does anyone know why more of Robert Bresson's films are not availa
ble on video?  I would be tempted to sell my first born to get a copy of L'Arge
nt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2