SCREEN-L Archives

June 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Wm. R. Pace" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Jun 1995 12:04:17 -0400
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
As the original questioner on the topic of of diegetic, I'm extremely
thankful for all the elucidating responses -  I certainly did not expect so
many!  I feel I now have a  solid understanding on the diegetic concept and
excellent references to pursue further investigation.
 
 Just one last question: how is it pronounced?  My guess is just like it
looks: die-ghetic.  If someone could let me know, I think I'll be pretty up
on the diegetic "thang."
 
Thanks for all your responses - that's what these listserv's are all about!
 
Wm. R. Pace
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2