SCREEN-L Archives

December 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Jeremy Butler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Dec 1993 14:16:54 CST
Comments:
<Parser> W: Invalid RFC822 field - "V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0536; Thu, 2 Dec 1993 16:28:45 -0600". Rest of header flushed. Resent-From: Jeremy Butler <JBUTLER@UA1VM>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Date:         Thu, 2 Dec 1993 08:41:00 EST
From:         Sarah Projansky <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: VIEWER SURVEY ON MPAA RATING SYSTEM
 
Christopher:
 
Please send your complete e-mail address.  I don't think what you
included with the survey is enough for our responses to get back
to you.
 
Also, does "film critic" include those of us who write film
criticism for academic journals (like Screen, Cinema Journal,
Camera Obscura, etc.)?
 
Sounds like an interesting project.
 
Response:  My complete e-mail address is [log in to unmask]  Sorry
about that.  And yes, the critics survey does extend to critics for academic
journals.  Also, in response to an earlier comment sent to me about my survey,
I did make a mistake.  The first few questions regarding the presence of NC-17
films in theaters and video stores should be simply "yes" "no" questions.
Anyone esle completing the survey can simply put 1 or 5.  I had meant to change
that, but I was working from an old copy of my survey, not the corrected one.
Once again, thatnk you for your time and cooperation.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2