SCREEN-L Archives

July 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Murray Pomerance <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:57:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
It strikes me that Mike Frank, or mike frank, or the human who is called
by other humans "Mike Frank," really desires to think of film as a kind
of text.  Well, I don't want to stop him.  I just don't think of it that
way.  I think the topic is getting a bit warm, though, as in flamey.
Stavis and I don't think about it the way Frank thinks about it.  There's
nothing wrong--or even particularly interesting--in that.  Nothing
personal was intended by me.  I'm actually trying to defend what I think
film is, and I trust that Mike Frank is too.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2