SCREEN-L Archives

July 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"NAME \"Rich Washabaugh\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 1995 21:17:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I'd like to thank everyone who responede to my question about narrative vs.
spectacle.  All your answers were extremely helpful, and you have given me
several ideas for my paper.  Along with those ideas, i think i am developing a
greater apreciation for how spectacle can be used to convey meaning and depth
in film.  It is amazing how i never noticed the wealth of information in the
visual aspects of a film.  I'm sure that i've been getting this info all along,
i just necer was really conscious of it before.  kind of like hearing
something, and using that info, but never realizing how you got it.
        again, thank you all for your insight and help.
yours,
rich w.
 
********************************************************************************
Rich Washabaugh                   |              Internet:[log in to unmask]
635 Church St. Apt. 2             |                       Phone: (412) 357-8826
Indiana, PA 15701                 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I want room service!"            |  "When you say 'others' do you mean OTHERS?"
                 -Keanu Reeves    |                       -Cary Grant
                 "Johnny Mnemonic"|                       "Arsenic and Old Lace"
********************************************************************************
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2