SCREEN-L Archives

April 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Jeremy Butler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 1995 19:13:22 CDT
Comments:
RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored. RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored. Resent-From: Jeremy Butler <JBUTLER@UA1VM> Originally-From: Robert 212 / 346 - 8452 Greer at BMAcadm City University of New York S / 152 199 Chambers Street, New York NY 10007
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Re:   three, four and five stars
 
      The Michelin guide popularized -- if it did not introduce -- the use
 
      of one, two and three-star designations;  if memory serves, one star
 
      was for a restaruant worth stopping at if you were passing by, two
 
      for a restaruant worth making a side-trip to and three for a
 
      restaurant which was worth making an entire trip.  Four stars is puffery.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2