SCREEN-L Archives

June 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Desser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Jun 1995 15:08:19 -0600
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
The lack of outlets  for "think pieces" that Don Larsson alludes to as a
contributing factor vis a vis the lack of "readable critics" is a very good
point.  An even better one might be, as Don wrote, "But then, what these
days could puzzle, shock, annoy or delight in the way that Bergman,
Fellini, Kurosawa and so forth did when first seen on American shores?
There's a whole world of films out there, but we hear precious little about
any but a few."  Either there is NOT a world of great films about there,
and so little inspires potential critics, or, if there are, changes in the
market place have kept us in the dark  (so to speak).
 
 DD
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2