SCREEN-L Archives

August 1991

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jeremy Butler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Aug 1991 14:40:39 CDT
In-Reply-To:
Message of Wed, 21 Aug 1991 13:00:46 TZONE from <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Wed, 21 Aug 1991 13:00:46 TZONE <[log in to unmask]> said:
>Excuse my naivette, but what is/was the Kinko's decision. I
>probably came into this discussion late, but it seems there's
>been some recent change in copyright laws that I, a classroom
>teacher, know nothing about????
>
>      Anne Pemberton
>       Nottoway, VA
 A
A quick sum:
 
Several publishers took Kinko's to task (and to court) for the course
packets they had been making up (professor-selected groups of articles).
Kinko's argued that they had just been making "fair use" of these
copyrighted materials.  The courts disagreed and now Kinko's must get
copyright permission for every single article they reproduce.
 
This is how I understand it, anyway.  Any corrections from others with
clearer memories?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2