SCREEN-L Archives

October 1998, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Damian Peter Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 12:10:09 +0100
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:09:41 +0000 Ed Owens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
 Certainly, a phenomenological approach to spectatorship is just as
> valid as a psychoanalytic approach...or at least has the potential to be as
> valid.
 
Exactly one of my points, Ed. As many of my students have a
keen interest the phenomenological approach, does this mean
it should be discouraged. On psychoanalysis, Deleuze doesn't
just ignore it but actually posits an alternative theory
based on Bergson's ideas on naturalism, but of course, that
would set the cat amongst the Creedian pigeons.
 
 
----------------------
Damian Peter Sutton
[log in to unmask]
 
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2