SCREEN-L Archives

June 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"John G. Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jun 1994 11:59:35 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
 
        I would like to mention one aspect about television, especially
as contrasted with film, which follows the "psychology" line.  Beside the
obvious, I've always wondered what is the essential difference between TV
and film is.  And, from a psychological POV, it is...time.
 
        Television today(I think), exists as a place in time.  It is
really a medium of time rather than a medium of artistic expression.  In
other words, Monday night at 8:00, as a point in time that will exist
then, and then its gone forever.  In this respect it mirrors our lives.
 
        I'm not saying that televison cannot be a means of artistic
expression, because occasionally it does.  But psychologically, it has
become a part of our own rhythm patterns.  We sort of breath in and out,
and television does too.  So, I think its importance to us on an
emotional level is very strong.  Sure there is a lot of crap, but it
paces our lives SO closely.
 
        I think we dismiss TV too quickly sometimes.  Not because it is
frequently so bad, but because we are tied to it on a very deep level and
refuse to admit that it is.
 
____________________________________________________________________________
 
---------------->from John G. Thomas ([log in to unmask]) <-------------------
____________________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2