LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: QT and film history

Patrick B Bjork <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 21 Oct 1994 22:35:14 -0500
text/plain (16 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
But, Gene, (and no offense intended) while I agree that some have gone
overboard with QT, we--meaning Shawn, myself, and several others--were
merely analyzing the film which is what we all normally do on this list.
I don't recall any of us alluding, or making comparisons, to other
directors, until a few insisted that QT undergo some kind of canonical
litmus test. Certainly no text exists in isolation, but c'mon, if
everytime we discuss a film we have to hold it up against somebody else's
criteria for what constitutes "appropriate" art, than Jeremy may as well
shut this list down right now.
 
Patrick Bjork, who thinks that those who dislike QT should stop
name-dropping and start supporting their assertions with some cogent
arguments
Bismarck State College
[log in to unmask]
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3