SCREEN-L Archives

July 2001, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"D. Matthew Ramsey" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:50:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I was reading the Howard Hawks section in Wollen's SIGNS AND MEANINGS
(1969)the other day, then I picked up Lee Russell's NEW LEFT REVIEW 1964
article on Hawks, and noticed not just Wollen's stealing of ideas, as the
postscript from HOWARD HAWKS, AMERICAN ARTIST (co-edited by Wollen),
suggests, but blatant, word-for-word plagiarism for paragraphs at a time.
Has much been made of this plagiarism anywhere?  Can anyone refer me to any
examples of Wollen's defense of his "theft"?  Thanks in advance.


Matt Ramsey

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2