LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: aspect ratios of tv commercials

Gene Stavis <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 7 Dec 1994 10:30:10 PST
text/plain (20 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
<<Can anybody suggest why so many recent television commercials are
being shot and shown in a letterbox format?>>
 
Probably because it mimics the form of a much more "prestigious" art form
than television. Of course, that perception is sometimes unjustified, but
even tv types aspire to the more "traditional" medium of television. This is
allied with Marshall McLuhan's notion that the current dominant medium is
always seen as "less prestigious" than the previous dominant form (the
"rear-view mirror" notion of media).
 
It also intrigues me why so many video buffs insist on a "letterbox" format
of their favorite film. Not all films benefit from an ersatz "letterboxing".
It is primarily the anamorphic films which require it, but I constantly read
requests for "letterboxed" versions of "Citizen Kane" or other "flat" films.
I think this is also a misplaced idea of one form being inherently superior
to another. It's also evidence of a  culture-wide retreat into slogans rather
than serious inquiry into the actual facts.
 
Gene Stavis, School of Visual Arts - NYC
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3