a really interestiung question, not only for the specific answers it might
elicit but because it foregrounds in a dramatic and visible way [pun very
much intended] a major theoretical issue in cinematic [of visual] narration and
focuses our attention on the apparent "reliability" of visal evidence . . .
 
 . . . i hope the answers and comments are kept public rather than addressed
privately to lang thompson
 
mike frank  <[log in to unmask]>
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]