SCREEN-L Archives

September 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
ladd kimberly a <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Sep 1995 20:08:33 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Speaking of Thelma & Louise . . . I'd like some feedback on an idea.
When I watched T&L the first time, I found it a very
exciting/liberating experience--I actually walked out of the theatre
feeling proud to be a woman. (Conversely (or rather, relatedly), when
I first saw The Accused I walked out of that theatre hating men in
general.)  Is the on-screen violence, in the case of T&L, a case of
the characters acting out the audience's desires--desires that are
otherwise socially unacceptable? If so, is this type of vicarious
acting- out phenomenon typical of Western-genre and road-films in
general?  And how might this reflect on films like the more recent
Falling Down?  Would anyone care to suggest related articles on this
topic?  I'd certainly appreciate it.
 
kim ladd
wm & mary
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2