SCREEN-L Archives

August 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Ramírez Berg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Aug 1996 18:20:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
>"The Odessa Steps" sequence from _Potemkin_ is not in slow motion.
>Eisenstein uses many "experimental" cinematic devices throughout the film,
>including over-lapped action and mismatched cutting, but there's no slo-mo
>in that sequence.
>
>David
 
Querry to David Desser:
 
Are there any slo-mo shots in other places in _Potemkin_?  And didn't
Eisenstein use slo-mo in other of his films?  I seem to recall some and I
always thought it was his was of emphasing a moment by elongating it in
time.  A reaping scene in _Bezhin Meadow_ perhaps?
 
Charles Ram=EDrez Berg
University of Texas at Austin
>----
>To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
>in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2