SCREEN-L Archives

March 2010, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Frank, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:57:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
though i'm far from an expert in these areas, i'm reasonably certain that in silent films color stock was often used to suggest the mood of a scene or sequence . . .   there was a code for what color was appropriate for what kind of scene; i don't recall the details but i think blue was for a scene at night, red for action sequences, and so on 

in any case the changes in color were there by design, and are not a function of aging film stock

i'm sure that other screen-L'ers can provide a lot more specific detail

mike   

-----Original Message-----
From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Norman Holland
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SCREEN-L] Tinting in silents?

Hi,

Recently, I've taken to watching silents streamed from Netflix.  Often, the
film willl change from a sepia color to blue or even red.  Are these color
changes intentional?  If so, what do they signify?  If not, are they an
artifact of preservation or what?

                      --With warm regards,

                                   Norm
Norm Holland

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2