SCREEN-L Archives

August 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bet MacArthur <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Aug 1996 18:11:56 -0400
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Aug 13, Ulf Dalhquist mentioned:
>Isn't it fascinating that the U.S. film industry is one of the most
>unionized businesses in the (democratic) world *and* is by far the most
>successful film industry (at least when it comes to quantity, I'm really
>not sure about quality).
 
I support the general point that the US circulates the most money in
operating its film industry, but concerning quantity of film, unless I'm
mistaken, isn't it India that produces the most feature film titles per year,
worldwide?
Regards,   Bet MacArthur
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2