SCREEN-L Archives

May 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Henry Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 May 1993 16:41:50 EDT
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Mon, 10 May 93 14:25:09 -0500. <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Rick --
Perhaps I am still not understanding your question on Chomsky. As a media
theorist, I don't find him particularly original. It seems to me that he fits
within a large tradition of political economists of the media. He does what he
does well, but he doesn't seem to be saying much that others haven't said
 before. I get the feeling that he gets a lot of attention because he is
 Chomsky, the
guru of Chomskyian linguistics, rather than because he represents a particularly
 original voice on media. I, therefore, don't know of much work in media
studies that is directly influenced by his writing; but I could point to many
writers who do work in a similar vein.
 
Henry

ATOM RSS1 RSS2