SCREEN-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
paul wiener <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:33:24 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<000801be7559$399a3860$0100a8c0@ford1>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Why is this interesting? It was a beautifully-made movie, just not a good one.

At 07:16 PM 3/23/99 +0100, Adrian wrote:
>Another interesting thing is that Truman Show received no prizes. On the
>other hand it wasn't any hit in the box-office...
>
>/Adrian
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of paul wiener
>Sent: den 19 mars 1999 15:58
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Oscar nominees
>
>
>Scott, I would be the first to second your opinion of "Shakespeare in Love"
>as overrated. I nearly walked out of it several times (anyone care to write
>about the joys of walking out on movies - 5, 30 or 70 minutes into it?) ;
>not until the last 20 minutes did I like it, though the acting was
>terrific. Just another feel good movie. "Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern Are
>Dead" was far far superior in every respect. "Thin Red Line" is a much more
>interesting film than "Ryan" but doesn't hold together well or make you
>feel good, except for cinematography. "Ryan" would be nothing without Hanks
>and the first bloody 25 minutes. I don't even like to choose anymore among
>Oscar nominess. They're almost always all hyped crapola. At least "Life Is
>Beautiful" was original.
>
>By the way, where's the discussion of the Kazan Oscar honors? It seems once
>you turn 70 no one is allowed to criticize you anymore? Kazan could do a
>lifetime of good by saying something important about his decision at the
>Oscars. My money says he won't. He's already been professionally honored
>enough, so don't believe ANYTHING anyone says: this honor is purely
>political.
>
>
>Paul B. Wiener
>Special Services Librarian
>SUNY at Stony Brook
>516/632-7253
>[log in to unmask]
>
>----
>Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
>http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite
>
>----
>For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
>http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html
>
>
Paul B. Wiener
Special Services Librarian
SUNY at Stony Brook
516/632-7253
[log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2