SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:41:30 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
The following part of your post intrigue me, Gene.  In what way
was Langlois the enemy of "academics and critics"?
 
I always thought that he did a great deal to nurture the young
critics-who-really-wanted-to-be-directors (Godard, Truffaut, et al.)
that eventually became the New Wave.
 
And did he not get along with film academics?  How so?
 
Just wondering...
 
--Jeremy
 
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
Langlois believed with all his heart that every film must be preserved and be
seen. He was the enemy of bureaucrats, academics and critics, although he
co-existed with and often admired all three. He built the world's greatest

ATOM RSS1 RSS2